Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register. Apr 1st, 2018, 03:47am
ATTENTION MEMBERS: Conforums will be closing it doors and discontinuing its service on April 15, 2018. We apologize Conforums does not have any export functions to migrate data. Ad-Free has been deactivated. Outstanding Ad-Free credits will be reimbursed to respective payment methods.
Thank you Conforums members.
Speed up Liberty BASIC programs by up to ten times!
Compile Liberty BASIC programs to compact, standalone executables!
Overcome many of Liberty BASIC's bugs and limitations!
It's strange though, when you put the print loop before the sort statement, it shows the correct data at column 58 for 25 rows.
Why is that strange? Since the bug is in the SORT statement, and at that point it hasn't yet been executed, you would surely expect the array to print correctly?
Quote:
A slight error in LB?? Or in the definition of the sort statement in the help file??
We know it's not an error in the help file because experimentation (and LBB) confirm that SORT works the way it is documented to work. So it's definitely a bug (not a "slight" one in my opinion) and indeed, as Anatoly pointed out, it's already listed at the LB Bug Tracker Wiki here.
Logged
