LB Booster - LBB runs 7 times slower than LB on my GBRL-Sender

LB Booster

General

General Board (Moderator: Richard Russell)

LBB runs 7 times slower than LB on my GBRL-Sender

« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Pages: 1 ... 2 3 4

Author

Topic: LBB runs 7 times slower than LB on my GBRL-Sender (Read 1578 times)

xtal
New Member

member is offline

Gender:

Posts: 27

Re: LBB runs 7 times slower than LB on my GBRL-Sen
« Reply #59 on: Dec 28^th, 2017, 5:13pm »

[quote author=Richard Russell

No. Have you never used a SUB event handler before - not even for a GUI event such as a button click? This is absolutely standard practice (indeed it is preferred over the branch label kind of handler in almost all circumstances). When using SUB handlers control returns to the WAIT statement - that is precisely why I think it might be helpful, because the WAIT gets executed once but never again.

Richard. [/quote]

I thought the wait was the next instruction..
Anyway Is there any way to pop the return off the stack?

Code:

After correctly adding the sleep the speed increased 
greatly on LBB run , but has +/- 2ms  bounce
while LB run has +/- 0.3ms bounce

The LBB.exe has close to the same as LBB run, with
occasional spikes to 28ms
ManualTx WRITTEN ok  ?Delay -NOT WRITTEN   TicMS -NOT WRITTEN

LBB Run program with sleep 
 ManualTx WRITTEN ok  ?Delay -NOT WRITTEN   TicMS -NOT WRITTEN

Speed INCREASED a lot, but is bumpy +/-2MS  
<12:46:05>  <100>  <1.657sec>  <16.5msTIC>
<12:46:06>  <100>  <1.801sec>  <18msTIC>
<12:46:08>  <100>  <1.773sec>  <17.7msTIC>
<12:46:10>  <100>  <1.736sec>  <17.3msTIC>
<12:46:11>  <100>  <1.685sec>  <16.8msTIC>
<12:46:13>  <100>  <1.816sec>  <18.1msTIC>
<12:46:15>  <100>  <1.762sec>  <17.6msTIC>
<12:46:17>  <100>  <1.709sec>  <17msTIC>
<12:46:18>  <100>  <1.688sec>  <16.8msTIC>
<12:46:20>  <100>  <1.716sec>  <17.1msTIC>
<12:46:22>  <100>  <1.764sec>  <17.6msTIC>
<12:46:24>  <100>  <1.8sec>  <17.9msTIC>
<12:46:26>  <100>  <1.763sec>  <17.6msTIC>
<12:46:27>  <100>  <1.809sec>  <18msTIC>
<12:46:29>  <100>  <1.867sec>  <18.6msTIC>
<12:46:31>  <100>  <1.842sec>  <18.4msTIC>
<12:46:33>  <100>  <1.749sec>  <17.4msTIC>
<12:46:35>  <100>  <1.73sec>  <17.2msTIC>
<12:46:36>  <100>  <1.771sec>  <17.7msTIC>
<12:46:38>  <100>  <1.667sec>  <16.6msTIC>
---DONE-1---

***************************************************************
LB Run program with sleep 
ManualTx WRITTEN ok  ?Delay -WRITTEN ok   TicMS -WRITTEN ok
***************************************************************

Speed stable with +/-0.3ms
<12:51:46>  <100>  <1.562sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:51:47>  <100>  <1.562sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:51:49>  <100>  <1.568sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:51:51>  <100>  <1.58sec>  <15.7msTIC>
<12:51:52>  <100>  <1.558sec>  <15.5msTIC>
<12:51:54>  <100>  <1.559sec>  <15.5msTIC>
<12:51:55>  <100>  <1.567sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:51:57>  <100>  <1.567sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:51:58>  <100>  <1.555sec>  <15.5msTIC>
<12:52:00>  <100>  <1.562sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:52:02>  <100>  <1.569sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:52:03>  <100>  <1.565sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:52:05>  <100>  <1.571sec>  <15.7msTIC>
<12:52:06>  <100>  <1.562sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:52:08>  <100>  <1.56sec>  <15.5msTIC>
<12:52:09>  <100>  <1.564sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:52:11>  <100>  <1.563sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:52:13>  <100>  <1.564sec>  <15.6msTIC>
<12:52:14>  <100>  <1.579sec>  <15.7msTIC>
<12:52:16>  <100>  <1.566sec>  <15.6msTIC>
---DONE-1---

« Last Edit: Dec 28^th, 2017, 5:16pm by xtal »

Logged

Richard Russell
Administrator

member is offline

Posts: 1348

Re: LBB runs 7 times slower than LB on my GBRL-Sen
« Reply #60 on: Dec 28^th, 2017, 5:52pm »

on Dec 28^th, 2017, 5:13pm, xtal wrote:

Is there any way to pop the return off the stack?

Not too sure what you mean. What are you trying to achieve?

Quote:

After correctly adding the sleep the speed increased
greatly on LBB run , but has +/- 2ms bounce
while LB run has +/- 0.3ms bounce

By "bounce" do you mean 'jitter'? Jitter of that order is entirely to be expected.

If you are wanting LBB to behave identically to LB you are going to be disappointed. Indeed your other problems (font issues and 'non-displaying' textboxes) are caused by you making insufficient allowance for predictable variations between platforms, and you would likely see similar 'failures' if you ran your program in LB but under Wine rather than Windows. Even a different version of Windows or a different 'theme' setting might be sufficient. Modifying your code so that it works in LBB as well as LB will make it generally more reliable! grin

Can we draw this thread to a close now?

Richard.

« Last Edit: Dec 28^th, 2017, 5:55pm by Richard Russell »

Logged

Richard Russell
Administrator

member is offline

Posts: 1348

Re: LBB runs 7 times slower than LB on my GBRL-Sen
« Reply #61 on: Dec 28^th, 2017, 6:01pm »

I have locked this thread because the original reported issue ("LBB runs 7 times slower than LB") has been resolved. Other issues are best raised in a new thread.

Richard.

« Last Edit: Dec 28^th, 2017, 6:26pm by Richard Russell »

Logged

Pages: 1 ... 2 3 4


« Previous Topic \| Next Topic »